Well, I doubt anyone here will get it but here goes.
Videogames have a chemical capacity to train us. In the same way that you would use treats with a dog, videogames give us calculated dopamine rewards to keep us playing, keep us progressing, keep us spending money. It used to be that videogames hooked a user by challenging them, triggering a dopamine release in the brain (which can still be addicting, as stated in the first paragraph of that article). Because dopamine is released proportionately to the struggle that is overcome, each level would get harder and harder, and the reward would increase in tandem to keep a player engaged. In contrast, the “modern videogame,” if you will, allows for more or less constant progression and keeps the player hooked with visually flashy rewards (damage markers, like in World of Warships, for example) or by increasing the amount of the reward itself, not so much the struggle to get it. So, while older videogames increased reward by increasing difficulty, new ones just increase the reward directly, making them more infinitely grindable for less development time, and ultimately more addicting. This is the fundamental difference between playing for achievement and playing for accumulation. It is a shift happening across the entire industry, and CCP is not exempt.
Over the past several years, CCP has systematically increased iskflow from most major sources, while reducing the barrier for entry with skill injectors, citadels, and sov reworks, among others. Part of this is increasing the actual faucet—anom respawn mechanics, rorquals mining versus hulks—but another part is increasing the functional iskflow, largely by increasing safety drastically. We must be aware, while turning the dials on ratting ticks, they are also turning dials in our brains. Increasing iskflow is their way of following the above trend in gaming, providing more reward with less challenge, making the game more addicting in a shallow way, and less engaging in those deep and meaningful ways that make EVE players feel like they have a secret over the rest of the gaming world.
Perhaps the most direct result of this has been that player progression is now a measure of wealth and assets, not knowledge and exploits. While there are always exceptions—Katia Sae, for example—the general culture and the discourse used by EVE players has swung to evaluating progression based on assets, not achievements—a trend reflected in the countless comments I’ve seen over the past few days about “little alliances catching up,” as if what they own is the only measure of their ability to succeed or compete in game. (There are plenty of wormhole corps who have success without any supers at all, but they don’t subscribe to the simple measurement of wealth as success.) Perhaps then we shouldn’t think about pvpers and krabs but about achievers and accumulators, however they do what they do. (Yes, I do think pvp gatecampers count as accumulators too.) This leads us to the actual answer to my question: Why do accumulators seem more likely to threaten to quit than those in other playstyles?Загрузка...
If player success is measured in what we do with our assets, and those assets are threatened, we will find another way to do what we do. Our success has been made harder—we have been pushed to the next level, in oldschool terms—but it hasn’t been fundamentally removed.
If player success is measured by assets alone and those assets are threatened, we will feel as though someone has reset our progress; our gameplay will be fundamentally threatened, our achievements literally removed, and we will be rightfully angry.
This difference is perfectly encapsulated in the famous
blackout meme, in which the hunter’s gameplay is based on actions, the krab’s on assets. The hunter’s gameplay is made harder but not fundamentally threatened, so they try to find a way around. The krab’s assets are threatened, and it is a fundamental threat to their existence as an EVE player, not just to their playstyle.
That’s not a critique of the accumulator, however. My whole point is that they were lured into that mindset by bad game design. That’s not to praise the achiever either—they’re just struggling and inventing the way we all used to, and we have seen too many of them get burned out and quit after enough punishing changes. Another way to look at this dilemma is that EVE historically creates a different kind of gamer than other games, one who buys in for massive struggle for massive reward. The krab, in this meme, has been turned into the kind of player other games have, who seeks in EVE what they can get elsewhere. The hunter is a quintessential EVE player, who, no matter how hard their playstyle gets, still can’t get that feeling anywhere else. Neurologically, one can quit and one can’t.
Of course, either player can still quit. But Blackout, while a total design failure, still does illustrate how it took a decade to shrink the achiever mindset down substantially, and a month to shrink the accumulator.
Despite CCP’s rhetoric that “EVE is cruel but fair” and “Everything in EVE dies at some point,” and on and on, they have trained us over the past years, using isk and assets to trigger our brains’ reward systems more cheaply and fleetingly than real achievement, into a mindset of entitlement. Entitlement for safety, entitlement for the status quo. Entitlement to our sovereignty, so that invaders make us angry rather than excited. The list goes on and on. This has been like the Halo series trying to be COD (Reach, 4…) and losing its identity in the process. In this case, EVE’s problem is not a loss of identity, nor a loss of playerbase—it is the metamorphosis of its playerbase into one trained not to accept the changes that are needed for the game’s long-term health. How else could this sub have spent half a decade crying for these exact changes, and then turn around and screech bloody murder? What we consciously want and the way it subconsciously feels have been led into complete disconnection by years of irresponsible game design.
Also, I cut it down in size. Original here.
Source: Original link
© Post "This post on /r/eve" for game Gaming News.
Top 10 Most Anticipated Video Games of 2020
2020 will have something to satisfy classic and modern gamers alike. To be eligible for the list, the game must be confirmed for 2020, or there should be good reason to expect its release in that year. Therefore, upcoming games with a mere announcement and no discernible release date will not be included.
Top 15 NEW Games of 2020 [FIRST HALF]
2020 has a ton to look forward to...in the video gaming world. Here are fifteen games we're looking forward to in the first half of 2020.